Where were you when the earthquake happened on Saturday,
April 25? What did you think first? Who did you call – to check on their safety
or to reassure them about yours? Afterwards, did you receive numerous messages
about another earthquake about to happen? Did you also forward photographs of
damaged buildings or predictions of more earthquakes?
The events of the last two days – and our collective
reaction to them – have shown the truth of what the Washington Post said in an
article dated August 26, 2011. “Earthquakes rattle our psyches as much as our
structures.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4b9d/c4b9de26a8158c8e3d765f767a42a08bd365f492" alt=""
This seems to be the right time to talk about some
earthquake myths.
1. We can predict earthquakes:
As of now, there is no accepted method to predict the time, place or magnitude of an
impending earthquake. Research into earthquake prediction continues.
2. Earthquakes are
becoming more frequent: Research shows that the occurrence of earthquakes
of magnitude 7.0 or greater have remained fairly constant. However, a greater
number of seismological centers and more sensitive instruments mean that many
small earthquakes are registered and recorded which would have gone unnoticed
earlier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82f59/82f59e4d2811ef38973a83c574cf166195654020" alt=""
5. The magnitude of an earthquake determines whether it is a disaster: An earthquake of that registers at 7 on the Richter scale but occurs in the middle of a desert is much less a disaster than a magnitude 6 quake in a densely populated area. The magnitude of the damage determines classification, not that of the earthquake itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment